Lenovo 10TX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10TX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3140
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191223
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 619
71% 553 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 0.2
5% 4.57 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MEMPEK1J016GAL 14GB
9GB free
Firmware: K4110420
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 750
Write 157
Mixed 250
83% 386 MB/s
4K Read 153
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 82.1
369% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 871
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 106
185% 383 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 235%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 9.6 8.1 16 31 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 19.1
5% 6.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMUA5120ME86H9F-2666 Kingston 9905713-019.A00G 8GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.6% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM5624 PL2278H
Typical 10TX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10TX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback