PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090407 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '21 at 18:38 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 90 97 107 97 102 MB/s
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
177GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 190 195 166 120 118 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
663GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 108 110 110 105 110 MB/s
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 5 | 3 | 60 | 24" | 1280 720 | PHLC0C5 PHL 246V5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 75x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |