Packard EasyNote TV43HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TV43HC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard VG50_HC_CR
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 16:14
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 119
51% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 197
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 2.6 4.6 2.5 193 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 306
Write 338
Mixed 241
SusWrite 75.6
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 9.1
46% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 37.8
46% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 5R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 18% 67 31 6 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO22EC
History: Score 15: 2R 0G 5B | Score 42: 5R 5G 2B
Typical EasyNote TV43HC Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TV43HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback