Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 23:47
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 848
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 63.9
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 63.9
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9922
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 7.3
6% 27.6 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 8.9
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 23 29 25 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 116
Write 85
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 26.1
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 138 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 74.6
Write 77.2
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 138
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 157 156 154 153 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
167GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 89.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 94.2
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
313GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 47.1
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 62.4
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 79 73 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 64.5
Write 83.3
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 81.1
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 62.9
Write 64.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 62.8
78% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 43%
WDC WD16 00JD-55HBB0 160GB
149GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 35
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 40
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E 500GB
90GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 36.3
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 22.5
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
541GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 90.3
Write 97.9
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 97.3
108% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
254GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 81.1
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 79.8
92% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 33.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 20.4
40% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 12.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 8.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 54.6" 1280 701 SNY6B03 SAMSUNG
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback