Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 17:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 650
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
193GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 463 459 438 446 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 452
SusWrite 450
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 51.3
168% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 299
223% 295 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 32 14 25 25 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 287
Write 71.6
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 31
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 16.7
74% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 29.4
72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
214GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 110
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 110
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 32.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback