Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140620
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 180 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 299 36% 276 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26% Poor	Lighting 29.6 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 37.4 24% 32.9 fps	MRender 40.5 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 31.7 30% 37 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 218 223 224 213 207 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	79.4% Very good	Read 254 Write 180 Mixed 225 SusWrite 211 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 45.9 153% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 174 136% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 65: 8R 7G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
65%	40%	48	258	159	144	24"	1920 1080	BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z

History: Score 16: 1R 2G 5B | Score 65: 8R 7G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	227x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	203x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	151x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	141x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	59x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $927

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16