Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 709
62% 530 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 121
Parallax 159
92% 131 fps
MRender 99.6
Gravity 114
Splatting 79.1
78% 97.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 159 92 29 126 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 460
Write 436
Mixed 135
SusWrite 138
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 23.4
89% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 112
115% 190 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
37GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 132 80 143 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 254
Write 209
Mixed 210
SusWrite 111
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 29.3
108% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 157
127% 177 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
37GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 189 191 191 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 142
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 186
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
152GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 114 108 110 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 125
Write 96.8
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 103
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
75GB free, PID 70f5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 115 71 71 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 87.9
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 89.6
100% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 19.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback