Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 176 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 537 52% 428 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.9% Very good	Lighting 91.7 Reflection 107 Parallax 95.3 75% 98 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 94.2 Splatting 97.3 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 421 423 417 414 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 444 Mixed 397 SusWrite 409 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 48.2 163% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 132 124% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 93GB free Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 88 26 142 175 98 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 418 Write 329 Mixed 265 SusWrite 116 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 17.6 64% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 46.1 51% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 61%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 36GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 52 45 46 80 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 382 Mixed 304 SusWrite 84.7 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 49 168% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 335 257% 349 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 818GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 166 139 138 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 156 Mixed 89.8 SusWrite 149 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 4R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	79%	14	286	214	60	28.9"	1920 1080	PHL01EA PHILIPS FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	180x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	156x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	155x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	111x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	77x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	44x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	35x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $670

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16