| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Lenovo 1578D7G (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M. |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111026 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 25 '21 at 16:20 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
74.4%
Very good
|
72% 122 Pts
|
48% 356 Pts
|
22% 352 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gainward(10B0 0801) 2GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
15% 21 fps
|
18% 22.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 226 230 234 233 235 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
53% 235 MB/s
|
88% 30.5 MB/s
|
108% 171 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
22GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.4 10 11 11 10 MB/s
|
7.88%
Terrible
|
23% 18.8 MB/s
|
17% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.3%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 8 | 60 | 72.3" | 1280 720 | GSM0001 LG TV |
Typical 1578D7G Builds (Compare 29 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Lenovo 1578D7G
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2120Intel $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 3x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $75 |