Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 450
61% 453 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 137
Parallax 125
101% 129 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 114
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 128 160 161 187 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 215
Write 42.2
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 155
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 18.4
77% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 57.4
76% 147 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
152GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 96.2
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 83.4
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$24
458GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 0.1
2% 3.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 70%
WD WD5000AZLX-00ZR6A0 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 156 157 156 157 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 147
Write 100
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 151
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
371% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
185GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 156 157 156 156 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 95.9
Write 102
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 150
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 104%
HGST TOURO Mobile 500GB
160GB free, PID 1024
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 83 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 59.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 82.6
78% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0E84 SAMSUNG
Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback