Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 09:37
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 401
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 138
Parallax 126
102% 130 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 129
Splatting 114
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 138 112 120 129 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 172
Write 64.8
Mixed 116
SusWrite 125
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 17.9
71% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 57.4
62% 106 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
152GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 86 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.6
Mixed 54
SusWrite 83.3
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
465GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 126
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
WD WD5000AZLX-00ZR6A0 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 157 157 155 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 154
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
185GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 153 157 155 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 101
Write 99.2
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 152
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 104%
HGST TOURO Mobile 500GB
160GB free, PID 1024
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 89 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 53
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 88
78% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 4R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 29% 17 309 247 30 84.6" 1920 1080 SAM0E84 SAMSUNG
History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 21: 4R 0G 1B
Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback