Lenovo 10S0S0ED00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10S0S0ED00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3135
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400T-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 582
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3135) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.7 fps
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 11
8% 8.65 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 223 204 125 99 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 855
Write 479
Mixed 514
SusWrite 193
113% 510 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 44.2
151% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 38.3
79% 163 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 24.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10S0S0ED00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10S0S0ED00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback