Lenovo 422925G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 422925G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 145
60% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 421
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 242 237 238 238 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 235
Write 224
Mixed 221
SusWrite 240
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 28.3
92% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 196
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
302GB free
Firmware: AB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 62.6
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
85GB free
Firmware: A39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 36.4
Write 68.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 77.6
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 74%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
231GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 181 183 183 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 264
Write 166
Mixed 202
SusWrite 185
266% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 18.1
1,401% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 27.7
DQ Mixed 24.6
1,859% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 148%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C Samsung M391B5273DH0- Samsung M391B5273DH0- Samsung M391B5273DH0- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM56F9 W2361
Typical 422925G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 422925G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback