Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 06:48
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 267
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 687
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 21.4
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17.2
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 389 383 401 403 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 452
Write 359
Mixed 313
SusWrite 396
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 26.5
96% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 196
155% 225 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
932GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 151 155 153 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68% Good
Read 86.2
Write 55.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 151
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68%
Great: 123%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 103 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 158
Write 163
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 105
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback