Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 133 2-Core 240 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 792 76% 629 Pts	64-Core 1,088 67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q) 3,561 User benchmarks, average bench 86% Device(1A58 2009) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.1% Outstanding	Lighting 108 Reflection 130 Parallax 118 88% 119 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 102 Splatting 102 94% 117 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 96%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1645 1608 1484 1457 1459 1290 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	286% Outstanding	Read 2,016 Write 1,946 Mixed 1,558 SusWrite 1,491 394% 1,753 MB/s	4K Read 55.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 73.3 236% 79.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1041 DQ Write 769 DQ Mixed 884 666% 898 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 286% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.4% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 24.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	28.8"	1280 720	GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	1,311x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	504x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	401x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples	383x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	314x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	204x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	149x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	654x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	174x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16