Positivo POS-AG31AP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-AG31AP  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-AG31AP
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 12:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 77.2
43% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 79.8
8-Core 82.3
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 83.6
5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.1
0% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.6
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 90 75 114 100 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 87.6
Write 91
Mixed 89
SusWrite 97.4
21% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 8
25% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 50.1
DQ Mixed 30.3
25% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
457GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 67 71 62 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 86.2
Write 96.1
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 68.5
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-AG31AP Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-AG31AP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback