Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 06:53
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 56.7
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 214
62% 118 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 676
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 64%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6585) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 64
Parallax 49
54% 59.7 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 53.6
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,168
Write 965
Mixed 794
217% 976 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 24
81% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 1,005
745% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
49GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 654
Write 460
Mixed 579
126% 564 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 22.9
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 960
676% 855 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
295GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 306
Write 313
Mixed 274
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 22
80% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 348
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
222GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 306
Write 287
Mixed 224
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 15.6
56% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 251
208% 298 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 144 24.5" 1280 720 HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25
Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,092
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback