Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GU
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 02:25
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 258 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 770 79% 638 Pts	64-Core 989 61% 989 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 179F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7168 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.8% Good	Lighting 87.3 Reflection 92.4 Parallax 80.5 71% 86.7 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 80.2 Splatting 73.4 67% 83.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 521 417 419 420 379 281 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,009 Write 1,148 Mixed 1,021 SusWrite 406 202% 896 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 55.8 186% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 851 DQ Write 654 DQ Mixed 727 551% 744 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 291GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 116 118 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 126 Write 127 Mixed 55 SusWrite 117 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.7 257% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 22.4 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 62: 8R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
62%	50%	44	307	233	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUOD0ED

History: Score 13: 1R 2G 2B | Score 41: 4R 5G 6B | Score 62: 8R 4G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	12x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	11x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	6x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	3x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	2x

RAM
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GBMicronBench 76%, 20 samples	4x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 99P5663-008.A00G 24GBMicronBench 59%, 3 samples	3x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 66%, 25 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16