Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,029
98% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Zotac(19DA 3612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 240
Parallax 271
223% 262 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 227
Splatting 166
183% 232 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1170 1343 1342 1411 1051 1000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,901
Write 2,370
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 1,219
390% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 55.5
145% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,486
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,273
959% 1,291 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 255%
Great: 410%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
955GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 112 101 114 80 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 99
Write 86.1
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 98.6
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 67%
Samsung SSD 860 250GB
56GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 341 347 327 272 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 349
Write 357
Mixed 333
SusWrite 321
464% 340 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 24.1
1,774% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 25.9
2,049% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 205%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 32.5
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29.9
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 8R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 40% 20 110 7 165 23.8" 2048 1152 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $297

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback