Pcchips P65G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPcchips P65G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS P65G
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 17:33
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 140
60% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 140
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 15.4
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 107 105 110 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 101
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 77%
silicon-power 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.28% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 2.8
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 6.1
9% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65G Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips P65G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback