Lenovo 82CU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82CU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 169
2-Core 306
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 678
75% 590 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 30.7
23% 28.9 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 21.1
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1435 1116 797 795 802 796 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,631
Write 1,486
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 957
293% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 88.6
291% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 1,043
705% 872 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 249%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNCPMMLHR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 43.5
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 18.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 13.3" 1280 720 LEN8197
Typical 82CU Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82CU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback