Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 11:40
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 82 1-Core 152 2-Core 303 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 988 90% 756 Pts	64-Core 1,443 89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 94.5 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 86.2 77% 92.1 fps	MRender 98.7 Gravity 87.1 Splatting 74.5 70% 86.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 828GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1496 1524 1517 1523 1510 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 1,514 Write 1,534 Mixed 1,120 SusWrite 1,495 319% 1,416 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 81.9 287% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 683 DQ Write 937 DQ Mixed 272 356% 630 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 149 156 159 157 155 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 88.5 Write 124 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 151 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 90%
Sony MRW-E90 64GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 37GB free, PID 0baf Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 32 39 39 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 39.7 Write 38.1 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 36.8 51% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 4.7 290% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 88%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 338GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 143 149 150 149 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 87.4 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 147 132% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.4 120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 205GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 146 145 144 147 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 104 SusWrite 145 174% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 103%
WD My Book 1140 4TB 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 290GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 62.8 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 74.9 73% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 42,084 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 33.8 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 34 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	55"	1280 657	SNYAA04 SONY TV *00

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,150x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,720x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	916x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	885x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	701x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	600x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	305x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	277x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,460

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16