Aftershock N8xxEP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock N8xxEP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N8xxEP6
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 224
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 777
74% 615 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 62.1
50% 65.1 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 63.2
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 106 99 100 65 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 501
Write 156
Mixed 423
SusWrite 97.5
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 33.8
114% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 155
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 214%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$74
681GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 71 68 88 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 9.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 75.3
23% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
196% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM4AGS88N26-GIIHA0 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N8xxEP6 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock N8xxEP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback