Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 05:41
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 155 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 486 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 99 Reflection 101 Parallax 93.6 81% 98 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 93 77% 93.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 173GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 95 100 100 86 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 105 Write 95 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 93.4 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 10GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 39: 6R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
39%	17%	78	106	6	144	24"	1920 1080	ACI24E1 VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	75x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	70x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $356

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16