Packard EasyNote TM85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM85  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM85
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100422
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 93.7
44% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 62.1
8-Core 132
11% 97.1 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Acer(1025 036D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 177 184 189 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 198
Write 181
Mixed 181
SusWrite 186
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 11.5
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 15
18% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F EBJ10UE8BDS0-AE-F 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 3 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO22EC
Typical EasyNote TM85 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback