Packard EasyNote TM85

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100422
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 41.6 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 85.3 35% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 131 16% 126 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 177 180 174 178 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.5% Below average	Read 179 Write 156 Mixed 172 SusWrite 179 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 8.4 44% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 14.7 17% 28 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F EBJ10UE8BDS0-AE-F 3GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	6	15	11	60	15.5"	1366 768	AUO22EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TM85 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM85

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	15x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	10x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16