Supermicro PIO-536T-3-SM005

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro PIO-536T-3-SM005  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8ST3-SM005
Memory3.7 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101207
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 125
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 431
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 62.3
53% 65.6 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 54.4
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$79
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 108 89 121 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 164
Write 158
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 99.5
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$79
273GB free
Firmware: 0008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 164
Write 42.2
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 47.3
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATMEL 26DF321 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 1G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 14% 92 256 169 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0B42 S24D300
Typical PIO-536T-3-SM005 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Supermicro PIO-536T-3-SM005

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 130% - Outstanding Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback