Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 07:06
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 287 95% 174 Pts	4-Core 535 8-Core 827 84% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3762) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 184 Parallax 175 130% 173 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 170 Splatting 126 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,915 Write 1,414 Mixed 620 290% 1,316 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 62.9 232% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,178 DQ Write 1,041 DQ Mixed 649 612% 956 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 100 99 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 93.9 Write 90.9 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 98.9 112% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 37.2 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 39 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	28.6"	1280 720	SAM1015 LU28R55

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,628x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,228x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	855x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	825x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	702x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	623x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16