ECS H81H3-MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS H81H3-MV  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 174
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 178
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9A16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 151 161 175 167 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 181
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 158
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 133 129 128 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 91
Write 34.9
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 129
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
169GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 138 136 135 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 102
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 136
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP004GBLTU160N02 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 5% 78 11 4 60 27" 1920 1080 OOO0000 LED MONITOR
Typical H81H3-MV Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-MV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback