Positivo VJFE53F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo VJFE53F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-IL
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 256
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 401
60% 436 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 14
14% 15.5 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D512 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E990903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 230 155 216 259 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,627
Write 1,060
Mixed 967
SusWrite 303
219% 989 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 27.3
173% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 454
422% 645 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 167%
Great: 172%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
39GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 126
Write 36.4
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 35.2
52% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.9
208% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 04CB AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 21
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE53F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE53F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback