Asus ZenBook Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 609
69% 539 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 29.7
21% 28 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 19.4
21% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 902 905 513 388 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,484
Write 903
Mixed 723
SusWrite 614
207% 931 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 51.1
193% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 461
354% 470 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 177%
Great: 244%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 110 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 67.1
Write 88.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 109
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07D9
Typical ZenBook Q536FD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback