Asus ZenBook Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 03:51
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 623
70% 550 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 29.7
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 19.3
21% 27 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 527 396 284 283 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 552
Mixed 743
SusWrite 432
176% 799 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 50.5
187% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 466
355% 469 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 163%
Great: 244%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 53
Write 120
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 77.3
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07D9
Typical ZenBook Q536FD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback