Asrock AM1B-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock AM1B-ITX (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3 3,720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 41.5 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 64 28% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 123 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 17.9 Parallax 22.5 18% 20.8 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 99 110 108 101 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 317 Write 146 Mixed 318 SusWrite 95.8 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 19.8 63% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 151 108% 140 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM011 HM501II 500GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 106GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 67 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 67.1 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 65.4 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB 11,058 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	28.9"	1280 720	PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1B-ITX Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-ITX

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	19x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 29%, 134 samples	2x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 453 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	16x
HD 8280AMDBench 1%, 1,831 samples	2x
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
Q300 480GBToshiba $152Bench 80%, 5,920 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-173.A00LF 2x2GBUnknownBench 16%, 3 samples	2x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,140 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16