Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 13:31
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 353
41% 317 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118C) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 34 138 122 138 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 58
SusWrite 117
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
862GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 121 119 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 120
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
ST98823A 80GB
13GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 24.6
Mixed 18
SusWrite 24.6
31% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 16%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
0GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 18.9
Mixed 19.9
27% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.5
124% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 102 2GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.1
7% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 6% 117 49 37 60 27" 1920 1080 HWP3325 HP 27es
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 19: 3R 0G 4B
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback