Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K-E  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 92.8
46% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 184
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 16.9
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 10.7
10% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 95 101 74 71 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 223
Write 103
Mixed 128
SusWrite 86.2
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 19.6
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 46.9
DQ Mixed 23.2
21% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 48%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
140GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 57 48 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 79.4
Write 93.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 54.1
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
417GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 16 15 16 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Kingston DT R400 16GB
10GB free, PID 1687
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.9
Write 13.7
Mixed 9.7
20% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1
59% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR03E1 K222HQL
Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback