Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K-E  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 93
42% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 15
14% 17.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.7
10% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 218
Write 129
Mixed 127
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 19.6
72% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 23.4
21% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
100GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78
Write 84.3
Mixed 46.6
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
482GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,555
Write 24.9
Mixed 56.8
630% 879 MB/s
4K Read 291
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.4
12,420% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR03E1 K222HQL
Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback