Medion ERAZER X7861 MD61060

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion ERAZER X7861 MD61060  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION PA70ESGM
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 792
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.6% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 120
Parallax 93.4
71% 100 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 102
79% 95.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 310 313 316 312 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1914
Write 1,154
Mixed 854
SusWrite 338
235% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 68.2
229% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 932
724% 999 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 214%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 8400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 11% 19 329 256 120 17.2" 1920 1080 AUO149D
Typical ERAZER X7861 MD61060 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Medion ERAZER X7861 MD61060

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback