IBM 69Y5698

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIBM 69Y5698  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110208
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 121
53% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 392
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6.6
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 6.8
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5014 599GB
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 50 48 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 135
Write 24.3
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 49.1
49% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0665 SAMSUNG
Typical 69Y5698 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: IBM 69Y5698

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback