Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 16:24
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 286 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 785 77% 631 Pts	64-Core 969 60% 969 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2563 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	5.78% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 10.8 8% 7.07 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,173 Write 1148 Mixed 555 213% 959 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 67.2 236% 87.9 MB/s	DQ Read 850 DQ Write 876 DQ Mixed 536 493% 754 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 17GB free Firmware: MS1OA810 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 130 129 135 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 104 Mixed 32 SusWrite 131 70% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 3GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.2 6.1 5.7 5.7 6 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 6.6 29% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.6 227% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,047x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	451x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	397x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	332x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	313x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	257x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	86x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $710

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16