Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 66.5 1-Core 147 2-Core 274 86% 162 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 783 75% 621 Pts	64-Core 961 60% 961 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 204 Parallax 123 99% 150 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 132 Splatting 115 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 921 Write 367 Mixed 426 125% 571 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 47.3 179% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 446 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 410 285% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 31GB free Firmware: MS1OA810 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 123 128 127 128 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 154 Write 161 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 126 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 69: 8R 6G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
69%	54%	46	300	233	144	23.5"	1920 1080	VSC36AF VX2458 Series

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,055x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	456x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	400x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	333x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	315x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	258x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	92x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	88x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	78x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	98x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	97x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $710

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16