Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 203 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 569 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.81 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 61.8 Parallax 50.5 48% 56.9 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 57.7 Splatting 48.2 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37128G 128GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 91 77 75 66 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 408 Write 166 Mixed 203 SusWrite 84.7 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 40.2 157% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 125 105% 152 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 211GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 105 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 18.5 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ7F32 BenQ XL2411Z

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	212x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	37x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16