TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706LI
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 11:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 214
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 395
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 74.3%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 178F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 4.3
4% 21.6 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.79%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,764
Write 695
Mixed 503
214% 987 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 65
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 644
495% 681 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 320%
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
43GB free
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,672
Write 816
Mixed 822
242% 1,103 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 44.3
157% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 467
358% 478 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 244%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
240GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 90 88 88 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 80.4
Write 78.8
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 87.9
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 48.4%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 26.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 90.8%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples466x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples147x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples19x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples362x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples270x
SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples471x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples19x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples15x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples193x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples135x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples34x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback