Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706LI
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 259
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 555
65% 504 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 178F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 3.1
2% 23.3 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,153
Write 631
Mixed 445
163% 743 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.9
200% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 694
545% 757 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 320%
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
44GB free
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 533 87 103 67 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 587
Mixed 582
SusWrite 275
160% 727 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 41.4
140% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 444
336% 441 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 139%
Great: 244%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 89 104 102 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 87.2
Mixed 54
SusWrite 97.1
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 26.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 28.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 28% 25 108 4 120 17.3" 1920 1080 BOE08BE
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX706LI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback