Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 113
50% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 360
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 8282) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 1.7
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 4
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 74 56 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 326
Write 292
Mixed 147
SusWrite 59
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 15
51% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 17.9
13% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
897GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 70 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 79
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 71.9
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
159GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 62 50 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 99.8
Write 93.1
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 64.1
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
475GB free
Firmware: SC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 75 71 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 136
Write 145
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 69
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
606GB free, PID 1011
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 24.1
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 24.6
33% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown     16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback