| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 870-219 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 82F1 |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181025 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 19 '21 at 07:52 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.3%
Average
|
44% 71.7 Pts
|
29% 240 Pts
|
31% 504 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.7%
Above average
|
51% 61.3 fps
|
51% 62.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 300 302 291 282 304 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
76% 339 MB/s
|
84% 27.2 MB/s
|
208% 281 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
590GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 120 119 121 122 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
65% 89.2 MB/s
|
194% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2400 C16 Series Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
60.8%
Good
|
66% 23.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
34% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 13% | 15 | 106 | 5 | 75 | 21.7" | 1920 1080 | GSM5B55 LG FULL HD |
Typical 870-219 Builds (Compare 141 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-219
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 136x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 97x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $286 |