Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 05:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 364
43% 334 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 10 144 115 39 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 480
Write 296
Mixed 29
SusWrite 112
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 1.2
42% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 47.2
68% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
24GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 114 101 96 94 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 107
Write 88.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 108
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$28
30GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 80 81 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 81.2
Write 80.1
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 79.1
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 5R 5G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 30% 71 67 54 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback