Lenovo 20C600AACA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20C600AACA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C600AACA
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 124
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 187
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 6.2
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 128 73 59 5.9 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 190
Write 102
Mixed 296
SusWrite 112
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 24.7
102% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 182
164% 248 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 95%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
21GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.2 12 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 37.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 9.1
21% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40B0
Typical 20C600AACA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C600AACA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback