Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 253
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 884
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2355 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 120
Parallax 140
7% 89.5 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 135
Splatting 116
114% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37120G 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 364
Mixed 336
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 40.4
154% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 41.1
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 87%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
107GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 137 138 137 136 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 312
Write 156
Mixed 209
SusWrite 177
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 25.4
105% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 55.3
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 53.5
41% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
584GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 120
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 140
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 69: 8R 5G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 52% 52 307 230 144 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z
History: Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 65: 7R 8G 6B | Score 69: 8R 5G 14B
Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback