Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 UD (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 84.2 1-Core 141 2-Core 283 92% 169 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 920 91% 744 Pts	64-Core 938 58% 938 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.6% Good	Lighting 67.3 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 73 55% 66.3 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 64.8 75% 96.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 795 Write 548 Mixed 552 140% 632 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 41.3 151% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 542 DQ Mixed 264 234% 340 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 252GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 98 104 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 161 Write 157 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 103 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GB 687 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 18 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	8	6	60	27"	1280 720	MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

CPU
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,791x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,407x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,476x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	995x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	817x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	598x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	366x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	316x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	313x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	485x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	479x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	225x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $780

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16