RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory3.5 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 145
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 226
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 67 94 112 111 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 96.9
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU502203EP0201 7GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 6
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback